Soldier Screwing 101
22 12 2007We’ve had the Feres Doctrine category for some time, but haven’t used it. It’s about time. And with yesterday’s prednisone compound injection into my spinal cord, I’m feeling prolific tonight (and jittery and irritable).
Feres is defined thusly:
“A legal doctrine that prevents people who are injured as a result of military service from successfully suing the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The doctrine comes from the U.S. Supreme Court case Feres v. United States, in which servicemen who picked up highly radioactive weapons fragments from a crashed airplane were not permitted to recover damages from the government. Also known as the Feres-Stencel doctrine or the Feres rule.”
Source: www.nolo.com
Broadly interpreted, this legal doctrine also prevents soldiers and their families from suing military doctors or a military hospital or a branch of the military for even the most egregious of medical malpractices. From amputating the wrong limb to leaving Army towels in a soldier’s abdomen during surgery (which became infected and ultimately killed him), to cases like mine in which an Army doctor felt compelled to render insults for expressing concern about losing sensation and movement in my right leg rather than medical care, military doctors are immune from consequences of their negligence and incompetence. This is shocking to most people when they learn of this doctrine. It certainly was to me. Fortunately there are at least two US Supreme Court Justices on record voicing disapproval of this doctrine. Perhaps in time, with the right combination of human cry and elected government Feres can be revisited and thrown into History’s dustbin where it belongs.
Categories : Feres Doctrine





